Reviews you can trust.
See why.Gyutou
In Europe, the chef's knife is a sturdy tool that can chop and slice anything. In Japan it's a thin, light precision instrument. What happens when East meets West?
Top Picks
See Everything We TestedWhat You Need To Know
A good chef’s knife is the single most essential piece of kitchen equipment—at least in the European-American tradition. It serves as an all-purpose tool for cutting, slicing, mincing, and chopping everything from herbs to vegetables to meat. The Western chef’s knife is 8 to 10 inches long, with a pointed tip for precision work, a thick spine for strength to push through tough foods, and a curved edge that helps rhythmically rock the blade to chop a pile of carrots, dice an onion, or slice a cucumber. The cutting edge won’t easily chip or break and is simple to resharpen; it also works like a wedge, pushing food apart with a 20-degree angle to each side.
By contrast, in Japan, there is no such thing as one all-purpose chef’s knife. Since cutting technique is paramount in this cuisine—in some ways more important than actual cooking—Japanese chefs have always used at least three different knives. The yanagi has a long, slim blade for slicing raw, boneless fish. The deba is a thick-spined, heavy little knife for butchering meat and filleting fish. The usuba has a slim, rectangular blade for cutting vegetables.
Japanese chefs believe that cutting food without any crushing is essential to retaining its natural flavor. As a result, their knives (even the chunky deba) have extremely thin, sharp cutting edges honed on just one side to a 15-degree angle. To support this thinness, the knives must be made of very hard steel. The downside? Such blades are both more brittle and harder to resharpen than the softer steel of a Western-made knife. But brittleness is unimportant in a knife that is drawn along the board to slice (or held in the hands in a paring action), as opposed to pounded up and down, Western-style.
For centuries, these two culinary traditions have remained distinct. Now, top Japanese knife makers (including the famous “three Ms”: Masamoto, Masahiro, and Misono)—and even venerable German manufacturers Henckels and Messermeister—have merged East and West in an entirely new breed of knife. Called the gyutou (ghee-YOU-toe) in Japan, this hybrid tool fuses Japanese knifemaking (harder steel, a straighter edge for slicing rather than rocking, and slimmer, sharper 15-degree cutting angle) with Western knife design (the Western chef’s knife shape, and a blade sharpened on both sides). The result is feather-light, lethally sharp, wonderfully precise—and nothing like the heavy German-style knives many of us are accustomed to using. For me, taking up one of these knives for the first time was like removing heavy ski boots after a day on the slopes. You’re expecting a heaviness that’s no longer there.
But no matter how gloriously lig...
Everything We Tested
Highly Recommended
- Design: 3 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 3 stars out of 3.
“Feels fantastic when you pick it up: comfortable, light, ready.” “A dream” for cutting up chicken and dicing onion, with its “very slim, sharp tip” and an acutely tapered blade that made it feel especially light as well as slightly flexible. With a blade more curved than most of the Japanese knives, it assisted a rocking motion that effortlessly “pulverized parsley into dust.”
- Design: 3 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 3 stars out of 3.
“Exceptional slicing, with no effort,” “excellent balance,” “the best-feeling knife in my hand,” raved some testers, though others disliked its squared-off collar. Rigid enough for squash, it sliced raw chicken skin without catching, but its straight blade was not conducive to rocking. As light as the Masamoto but less tapered, it has a stiffer, substantial feel that appealed to German-knife users.
- Design: 2 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 3 stars out of 3.
Our favorite inexpensive chef’s knife rivaled fancier, pricier knives yet again. Though “clearly not as amazing,” it had “no trouble going through anything,” with a “good curve” for rocking. While its profile is slim, the blade is stiff enough to cut squash easily. Rounded, textured plastic handle is “grippy, very comfortable.” “This knife even looks friendly.”
Recommended
- Design: 2 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 3 stars out of 3.
“Lovely, sharp, precise, light, and slim. Gets down to business.” However, its straight blade won’t rock, and some deemed its balance blade-heavy. Large hands found the grip too small, and knuckles knocked. Struggled with squash, but “effective” in butchering chicken, where it was “good at getting into little corners and tight angles.”
- Design: 2 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 3 stars out of 3.
This “santoku-like” knife had less taper from the spine, adding solidity, but subtracting agility. “Blade feels a little fat; it catches on the onion, wedging it apart,” said testers; “not as precise or as nimble as I’d like.” While most found it comfortable, it “bottomed out” in a “jarring” way, banging the board rather than rocking. But it cut squash “like a hot knife through butter,” with “perfect control.”
- Design: 2 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 3 stars out of 3.
Its extreme design—the lightest, thinnest, most dramatic taper—was loved or hated. In greasy hands, the metal grip felt slippery, a deal-breaker to some. Others found it “nicer than expected.” “I was really surprised by how much I liked working with this”; “it leapt to my hand.” “Very easy to make thin, even slices,” “exceptionally well balanced.” Tackling squash, “it didn’t hesitate.”
- Design: 2 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 2 stars out of 3.
“Very nice, sharp, light. Overall, a good knife.” Slightly rough edges made the grip less comfortable. Stiffness made the blade seem substantial, but while it “went through chicken and skin very easily,” it struggled with squash, cutting irregularly. Being the “straightest knife of the bunch” made rocking awkward; larger hands’ knuckles hit the board. In sum: “Not quite as super-sleek as others.”
Not Recommended
- Design: 1 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 2 stars out of 3.
“Beautiful, obviously well-made,” “sharp and fairly maneuverable” (and top-rated in edge retention), but we hated its long handle, finding hands “too far from the blade” and the knife “too heavy,” “the least balanced.” “It’s weird, like they took a Japanese handle and stuck it on a Western knife. If this is fusion, they got a little too much of both and not enough of either.”
- Design: 1 stars out of 3.
- Cutting: 1 stars out of 3.
Named “Stealth” because it is more than 8.5 percent lighter and 20 percent thinner than the company’s regular chef’s knife, it still outweighed the rest of the lineup. Universally disliked and rated “poor” for edge retention, its heavy, wedgelike blade did wonders with squash—its only virtue. It was “too heavy,” “too awkward,” and “clunky,” “like a toy.”
Reviews you can trust
The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing.
Lisa McManus
Lisa is an executive editor for ATK Reviews, cohost of Gear Heads on YouTube, and gadget expert on TV's America's Test Kitchen.