Reviews you can trust.

See why.

Chinois Sieves

For straining stocks or sauces, we reach for a bowl-shaped fine-mesh strainer, but would a chinois, a traditional conical French sieve with ultra–finely woven mesh, give smoother results?

Published July 1, 2012.

See Everything We Tested

What You Need To Know

When a stock, sauce, or puree needs straining, most of us reach for a bowl-shaped fine-mesh strainer. Many restaurant chefs, though, prefer to use a conical, ultrafine-mesh sieve called a chinois, a traditional French kitchen tool. Would a tightly woven chinois (also called a bouillon strainer) give us smoother results? We chose three cone-shaped sieves and pitted them against our favorite round-bottomed strainer. We used all four to strain seeds out of pureed berries for raspberry sorbet and separate solids and bones from hot chicken stock. We soon learned that the small differences in mesh gauge didn’t matter—all were able to strain stock to a clear finish and eliminate seeds and solids from raspberry puree. What the best bouillon strainers offered were capacity and stability. 

Though it was easy to use, the round strainer (2¼ inches deep) was too shallow to strain all of the chicken stock at once—as was the smallest chinois, which had a short, 6-inch cone. The other two conical sieves, at 7 and 8 inches deep, allowed us to strain the whole batch of stock in a single pour. As we pressed on raspberry puree in each strainer to extract the solid particles and seeds, we discovered another advantage of the bouillon strainers, which all came equipped with L-shaped hooks opposite their long handles: The hookless fine-mesh strainer had to be held still or it would shift around on top of the pot as we pressed down; the bouillon strainers, stabilized by the hooks latched onto the pots’ sides, all stayed in place, freeing both hands for pressing. The Matfer Exoglass Bouillon Strainer, which has two hooks spaced 6 inches apart, was the most stable model of all, but is more than we’re ready to spend on a tool we aren’t likely to use every day. Our winner was comfortable, stable, and reasonably priced. We won’t be throwing out our more versatile and easier-to-store round strainers, but if you prepare large amounts of stock, jam, or sorbet, a roomy chinois can make the work much easier.

Everything We Tested

Good : 3 stars out of 3.Fair : 2 stars out of 3.Poor : 1 stars out of 3.
*All products reviewed by America’s Test Kitchen are independently chosen, researched, and reviewed by our editors. We buy products for testing at retail locations and do not accept unsolicited samples for testing. We list suggested sources for recommended products as a convenience to our readers but do not endorse specific retailers. When you choose to purchase our editorial recommendations from the links we provide, we may earn an affiliate commission. Prices are subject to change.
accolades badge

Reviews you can trust

Reviews you can trust

The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them.