Reviews you can trust.
See why.Plastic and Metal Water Bottles
Smart, durable, and spill-proof, one bottle clobbers the competition.
Our winning plastic water bottle, the Nathan LittleShot, has been discontinued. In its place, we recommend the Nalgene Wide Mouth. We will be publishing a new review of plastic, metal, and insulated water bottles soon.
Top Picks
See Everything We TestedWhat You Need To Know
The alley behind the test kitchen isn’t exactly a bucolic place to spend a breezy afternoon, but I, along with a photographer and videographer, had important work to do: dropping refillable water bottles onto the pavement, over and over again, to test their durability. Call it a cold, hard real-world test.
We were evaluating eight different water bottles. There are thousands for sale, so we narrowed our lineup to stick with a few key parameters.
First, we focused on basic single-walled bottles and considered only BPA-free models. (BPA stands for bisphenol A, an industrial chemical used in some plastics. It’s currently under review by the FDA, but critics claim that it can leach into food and cause health problems.) Also, we nixed straws because they’re difficult to clean thoroughly and tend to get funky fast. We avoided bottles made from glass, too, because it’s heavy and, of course, breakable. And we were strict on price; anything north of twenty bucks was out. Our final lineup of eight bottles, each costing between about $10 and $20, was made up of five plastic bottles, two stainless-steel ones, and a soft plastic pouch.
We wanted a bottle that was easy to fill, open, close, carry, clean, and sip from. It also had to be spill-proof and exceptionally durable. Before each bottle plummeted toward the pavement, a succession of testers evaluated its basic functionality. We then filled them with an electric-yellow sports drink and let them sit for 24 hours to check for unwanted staining. Some were dishwasher-safe, while others weren’t; we hand-washed or ran each through the machine 10 times, depending on manufacturer instructions, to check for wear and tear.
We bought extras of each bottle and assigned them to staffers, with the stipulation that they use them every day for two weeks and take them wherever they go. The bottles went to work in the test kitchen and at local restaurants; they went on long walks around the city, hiking in the mountains, to the gym, and to yoga; they rode in cars, trains, and buses and sat on the couch through Netflix marathons; one even took a weekend trip to Cape Cod.
Meanwhile, we ventured into the alley with our eight testing copies. We shook each full bottle vigorously upside down for 10 seconds and then dropped each from shoulder height onto the hard pavement—upside down, right side up, and sideways. Only half the bottles survived.
Of the three materials the bottles were made from, the soft plastic pouch was too squishy and awkward for everyday use. The stainless-steel canisters were problematic, too; testers sometimes spilled while filling them because they couldn’t see inside, and they dented ea...
Everything We Tested
Recommended
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 3 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2.5 stars out of 3.
This basic clear bottle was simple to fill, carry, and clean. It was easy to open and close and aced our durability testing. The only drawback: Its wide mouth was harder to drink from.
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 3 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2 stars out of 3.
This clear bottle had a bi-level screw-on cap, with one opening for filling and one for sipping. Its cap was on a stiff plastic leash and bonked us between the eyes while we drank. But it aced our abuse tests.
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 3 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1.5 stars out of 3.
This soft pouch was durable and spill-proof and had a nice drinking spout. Its soft sides were awkward, and we felt in constant peril of squeezing too hard and sending up a geyser. However, it was light and handy for traveling.
Recommended with reservations
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 2 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2 stars out of 3.
This clear bottle didn’t hold on to smells or stains and had a nice drinking spout. But its finicky latch and cheap plastic button were hard to open; during abuse testing it leaked and the meter for recording water intake broke.
Not Recommended
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 2 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1.5 stars out of 3.
This bottle’s small drinking spout and cap were too fussy. You had to unlock the lid, flip the cap open, and hold a slippery button while drinking. It was complicated, and the cap broke off during abuse testing.
- Cleanup: 2 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 2 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2 stars out of 3.
This bottle had an exposed drinking spout made of tacky rubber that collected dust. Its steel body meant that we couldn’t see inside, and it dented during the dropping test.
- Cleanup: 1.5 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 1.5 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1.5 stars out of 3.
This steel bottle had an exposed drinking spout, and we had to hold down a button to release water. The button isn’t covered, so if something nudged it, say, a shoe in a gym bag, the spout opened. It also dented when we dropped it.
Discontinued
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Durability: 3 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 3 stars out of 3.
This bottle’s clear plastic sides made it easy to fill, and its bi-level twist-on lid was secure and easy to sip from. Its tether stayed out of the way and folded into a handy carrying loop.
Reviews you can trust
Reviews you can trust
The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them.