Reviews you can trust.
See why.The Best Sauciers
An ordinary saucepan has its uses, but once you experience the ease of stirring in a saucier, you’ll wonder how you ever did without one.
Top Picks
See Everything We TestedWhat You Need To Know
Mention the word “saucier” in the test kitchen, and you’re in for an earful. The loyalists among us rave that these vessels, which are essentially rounded saucepans with wider mouths, flared walls, and rolled lips, can do everything a conventional saucepan can do—and that their distinct design features make some cooking tasks even easier. These include preparations like oatmeal, risotto, and polenta, where the food is prone to getting lodged in corners and burning, as well as custards and sauces that require frequent stirring. And as their name and wide-mouth design imply, they’re built for reducing sauces. (“Saucier” is also the name given to French cooks who prepare sauces, stocks, and soups.) And though models vary in shape and size, sauciers offer depth and capacity, as well as easy access to their interiors and corner-free surfaces that are easy to clean.
But while a saucepan is standard in any kitchen, sauciers have mainly been the domain of restaurant chefs. We thought it was time this changed. We gathered eight models with capacities ranging from 3 to 3½ quarts—the most common large size—and compared them with our favorite 4-quart saucepan from All-Clad. Six of these pans were fully clad, meaning they were made of alternating layers of steel and aluminum, which takes advantage of the best qualities of each metal. We also tested a “disk bottom” model (only the base is fully clad, and the sides are a single layer of stainless steel) and a hefty model made of enameled cast iron. In them, we prepared risotto, gravy, and pastry cream, noting their cooking performance as well as how comfortable they were to maneuver. We also tested their reduction speed by boiling a measured amount of water in each model for 10 and 20 minutes and weighing the results. Finally, since their curvy sides are known for being easier to clean than L-shaped saucepans, we washed each model by hand.
Surface Tensions
The good news: Every model delivered creamy risotto, satiny gravy, and smooth pastry cream, and it was a pleasure to whisk and stir in most of them. Our utensils glided against their curvy walls—a noticeable difference from the stiffer, bumpier movements they made in the saucepan. The Paderno was the exception; its L-shaped corners meant that it behaved more like a saucepan, trapping custard and rice.
The diameter of the base separated top performers from lesser models, affecting how frequently we had to stir the contents to ensure that food cooked evenly. When softening aromatics for risotto and gravy, testers using sauciers that measured less than about 5¾ inches across the bottom had to stir continuously, lest the vegetables pile atop...
Everything We Tested
Recommended
- Cleanup: 2.5 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2.5 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 3 stars out of 3.
With gently sloping sides and a generous opening, this pan made whisking and stirring a pleasure. It was also the most efficient at the evaporation test. Its lightweight frame and straight-angled handle make it very easy to lift. One criticism: The handle became hot over time, forcing us to use a potholder.
Recommended with reservations
- Cleanup: 2.5 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 2.5 stars out of 3.
This lightweight pan is easy to maneuver around the stovetop, though its cooking surface is on the small side and its walls are more sharply sloped than our top pots; that might explain why it was the slowest model to reduce water. Some testers complained that the handle’s edges were sharp, but most found it easy to grip without slippage.
- Cleanup: 2 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1.5 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 3 stars out of 3.
The walls of this pricey saucier come close to forming saucepan-like corners. As a result, testers had to hold their utensils at a sharper angle to stir, but the food it produced was flawless. Lifting its heavier frame was made more difficult by its steeply angled handle, which felt awkward and uncomfortable.
- Cleanup: 3 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1.5 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 2 stars out of 3.
The walls of this saucier slope smoothly down to the cooking surface without a hint of a corner, and testers loved the way spatulas glided around the interior, but its cooking surface is relatively skimpy. Short and slim, the handle rested uncomfortably against our palms, and cooks with large hands struggled to get a firm grip. Without rivets, cleanup was a breeze.
Not Recommended
- Cleanup: 2 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 3 stars out of 3.
We have no complaints about the size or shape of the pan itself (despite its name, it is a saucier). Unfortunately, we can’t say the same for the skinny handle, which bends upward at a sharp angle that provides poor leverage and makes the pot awkward to move, lift, and turn.
- Cleanup: 1 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 1 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 3 stars out of 3.
Although the manufacturer confirmed that it considers this pot a saucier, the vessel’s L-shaped walls make it behave more like a shallow saucepan; namely, its sharp corners trapped food, so cleanup was a chore. Testers struggled to keep the thin layer of vegetables from scorching on the extra-broad cooking surface, and the sharp-edged handle sacrifices several inches to a hook that’s too flat to hang securely.
- Cleanup: 2 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 0.5 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 1.5 stars out of 3.
We had to lug this cast-iron heavyweight around the stovetop, and its stumpy, scorching-hot handle was no help. The small, cramped cooking surface forced us to stir vegetables frequently to ensure that they didn’t steam. The abrasive side of a sponge scratched the enameled surface.
DISCONTINUED
- Cleanup: 2.5 stars out of 3.
- Ease of Use: 2.5 stars out of 3.
- Performance: 3 stars out of 3.
Our runner-up is heftier than our winner, with walls that slope just slightly less gently toward the cooking surface. Still, it cooks food beautifully, and its wide, easy-to-grip handle extends at a comfortable angle from the pan.
Reviews you can trust
Reviews you can trust
The mission of America’s Test Kitchen Reviews is to find the best equipment and ingredients for the home cook through rigorous, hands-on testing. We stand behind our winners so much that we even put our seal of approval on them.
Kate Shannon
Kate is a deputy editor for ATK Reviews. She's a culinary school graduate and former line cook and cheesemonger.