Menu
Search
Menu
Close

Blade-Style Coffee Grinders

How we tested

Coffee aficionados will tell you that a good grinder is critical to getting the best cup of coffee, claiming that all the coffee particles need to be about the same size to get a smooth, even brew free of overly bitter or harsh flavors. To achieve this, coffee shops and dedicated home brewers often use burr grinders, a style of coffee grinder that works like a pepper mill and forces each bean to pass through a set of metal rings called burrs. The best of these machines can produce an extremely even grind, allowing baristas to provide consistent cups of coffee to their customers day after day.

Many people instead choose blade grinders, which are compact and cost a fraction of the price. These work like tiny food processors, with a blade that spins to chop the coffee beans. The longer you hold down the button, the finer the coffee gets. But which blade grinder is best? To find out, we tested six models, priced from about $15 to about $22, using each to grind enough beans to make one, four, and 10 cups of coffee. We used the grinders to achieve a fine, medium, and coarse grind with both light-roasted and dark-roasted beans. Finally, we had six testers—ranging from novices to coffee experts—operate each grinder to gauge its user-friendliness.

Pulse, Shake, Repeat: How to Use a Blade Grinder

Which grind size you aim for depends on your brew method: coarse grind for French press, medium grind for drip machines, and fine grind for espresso. However, with our lineup of blade grinders, we found that simply holding down the “on” button until some of the coffee looked to be the right consistency often led to uneven results, with powdery clumps of overprocessed coffee interspersed with untouched whole beans. In the coffee industry, the powdery bits are called fines and the underprocessed beans are known as boulders. While we've learned that grind evenness isn't the only factor in brewing good coffee, leaving whole beans in your brew basket is a waste—those unprocessed beans are too big to add any flavor in the short time it takes to brew a pot of coffee.

Christopher Hendon, assistant professor of computational materials chemistry at the University of Oregon and author of Water for Coffee (2015), told us that if you simply hold down the grind button, some beans end up overground, while others never come in contact with the blade. “There's a floating effect, where the big pieces float on top of the swirling fines and never get broken down,” Hendon said. To combat this, experts recommend pulsing the grind button and shaking the grinder in between pulses to redistribute the grounds.

We adopted a pattern of shaking the grinder in between 1-second pulses. For some of the grinders, this helped even out the grind. We confirmed this by using a device called the Kruve Sifter—a handheld particle separator used by coffee professionals in the World Barista Championship—to separate out the boulders and fines. What was left over were the medium pieces, the similar-size particles that are the optimal size for a medium grind. We found that the blade grinders in our lineup produced coffee that ranged from 30 to 46 percent medium particles, compared to nearly 90 percent in our top-rated burr grinder.

However, shaking and pulsing weren't enough to improve the performance of some blade grinders; we still found whole and partially processed beans in three of the models in our lineup despite pulsing, shaking, and grinding longer.

Does Blade Height Matter?

Blade grinders bear many similarities to food processors, and in our testing of the latter, we learned that the height of the blade is crucial. We measured this distance in each of the blade grinders; it ranged from 6.1 to 14.1 millimeters. The average length of a coffee bean is 10 millimeters, and we found that models with more than 9 millimeters between the blade and the base of their grinding chamber ground coffee less evenly, allowing whole beans to pass under the blade and never get fully broken down. Our favorite grinder had just 6.4 millimeters of space, ensuring that—with proper shaking—we never saw any whole beans in the grind. It achieved the most even grind of any model in our lineup, at 46 percent medium pieces.

Capacity Is Important

The amount of beans you grind depends on how much coffee you're making; a good grinder should be able to process anywhere from a single serving to a full pot's worth of beans. To test capacity, we used the specifications for brewing a full pot (10 servings) of coffee in our winning automatic drip coffee maker, which requires just under 70 grams (about 1 cup of ground coffee). Most of the grinders were able to accommodate this amount, but two struggled. One just barely contained all the beans, and with the grinding chamber packed so full, the grinder struggled to break them down. The other could fit only 48 grams of coffee beans (enough to brew about seven cups), so we'd have to grind in two batches if we wanted a full pot. While many of us are probably not brewing a full pot every day, smaller-capacity grinders proved more difficult to use even when they weren't overflowing: Grounds flew over the sides when we opened the lids, and we had to be extra-careful not to spill beans all over the counter when we loaded these petite grinders. Our favorite grinder, on the other hand, had a capacity of 75 grams, which made it more versatile and tidier.

Innovative Designs Fall Flat

Many cooks use a blade grinder not only to grind coffee but also to process whole spices such as cumin or coriander seeds. However, traditional blade grinders have the grinding chamber built into the base, which makes them hard to clean. For this reason, we recommend having a separate grinder for spices.

Two products in our lineup attempted to solve this problem with removable and/or interchangeable grinding chambers. Similar to a blender carafe that sits on a base, these grinders featured a small metal grinding chamber that could be removed from the sensitive electronic base and either washed or swapped out for another grinding chamber. This allows you to grind spices and coffee in the same machine without the potential for a cumin-flavored cup of coffee. While this is a good idea in theory, these innovative grinders were messy: The coffee grounds sprayed up and over the grinding chamber and then got sucked down into the base, meaning a lot of our coffee ended up underneath the grinding chamber, not inside it. We preferred the simpler, cleaner operation of traditional-style blade grinders. (Ultimately, we still recommend buying a separate grinder for spices.)

We considered other design differences as well, such as the ease of holding down the grind buttons, where these buttons were placed, and how easy it was to monitor the coffee as it ground. Some grinders had buttons or shaded lids that partially obscured our view of the grinding. Others were so difficult to press down that we had to grip the grinder with both our hands. We liked responsive grind buttons, a clear lid, and offset buttons so our hands didn't block our view of the grind.

The Best Budget Coffee Grinder: Krups Coffee and Spice Grinder

Our favorite blade grinder was once again the Krups Coffee and Spice Grinder. It was incredibly simple to use and had a roomy grinding chamber and a crystal-clear lid that let us monitor the grinding. How did the coffee compare to coffee ground in our favorite burr grinder? We held four blind tastings with the help of coffee experts—including baristas, coffee shop owners, and roasters—and every time, tasters were split on which coffee they preferred. While we still prefer burr grinders for their consistency and hands-off grinding, we found that you truly can get a great cup of coffee with a blade grinder.

Methodology

We purchased six blade grinders, priced from about $15 to about $22, and used each to grind one, four, and 10 cups' worth of coffee to fine, medium, and coarse consistencies. We performed each of these tests using light- and dark-roasted beans.

For each grinder, we determined the best grinding process, starting by grinding 10 grams of coffee for 15 seconds and then sifting it in a Kruve Sifter. We noted the grind's percentage of “boulders,” or large pieces; medium pieces; and “fines,” or smaller pieces. We then adjusted the grind time, repeating the process of grinding 10 grams, sifting, and making adjustments of 1 second until we found the grind time that produced the highest percentage of medium pieces.

Six users, both novices and experts, tried the coffee grinders and gave feedback about grinding and ease of use. A panel of 21 tasters sampled coffee ground in the top blade grinder alongside coffee ground in our top- and bottom-ranked burr grinders; we standardized the weight of the coffee grounds, the brew method, and the type of beans. We repeated this tasting three times, using a mix of novice tasters and coffee experts. Finally, we measured the distance between the blade and the bottom of the grinding chamber and measured the capacity of each grinder using whole beans. Results were averaged, and products appear below in order of preference.

RATING CRITERIA

Grinding: We prioritized a relatively even, consistent grind free of whole, unground beans.

Ease of Use: Our favorite models had clear lids so we could monitor the grinding, responsive grind buttons that didn't obstruct our view, and simple, intuitive designs.

Capacity: A good grinder should be able to accommodate enough beans to brew up to 10 cups of coffee, which is 70 grams of coffee in our top-rated drip coffee maker. We gave top scores to models that could hold this entire amount with a little room to spare, so the blade could still turn and grounds didn't spill over the sides when we removed the lid.

Cleanup: Lowest marks went to grinders that sprayed grounds onto the counter or had grind containers that were difficult to clean. Our favorite models were easy to clean and kept grinding tidy and contained.

Try All Three of Our Sites
FREE for 14 Days

Get Instant All Access to 25 Years of America's Test Kitchen

Included in your trial membership:

  • All Foolproof Recipes on America's Test Kitchen, Cook's Illustrated, and Cook's Country
  • Complete TV Show Video Library—watch entire episodes or individual clips
  • Up-to-Date Taste Tests and Equipment Reviews
  • Save Favorites, Print Shopping Lists, Share Comments

The Results

Winner
Recommended

Design Trifecta 360 Knife Block

Admittedly expensive, this handsome block certainly seemed to live up to its billing as “the last knife block you ever have to buy.” The heaviest model in our testing, this block was ultrastable, and its durable bamboo exterior was a breeze to clean. Well-placed medium-strength magnets made it easy to attach all our knives, and a rotating base gave us quick access to them. One tiny quibble: The blade of our 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a little.

$248.64*
Recommended

Schmidt Brothers Downtown Block

This roomy block completely sheathed our entire winning knife set using just one of its two sides—and quite securely, thanks to long, medium-strength magnet bars. Heavy, with a grippy base, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard made this model extra-safe but also made it a little trickier to insert knives and to clean; the wood block itself showed some minor cosmetic scratching during use.

$141.90*

Schmidt Brothers Midtown Block

This smaller version of the Downtown Block secured all our knives nicely, though the blade of the slicing knife stuck out a bit. With a base lined with grippy material, this block was very stable. An acrylic guard afforded extra protection against contact with blades but made it a little harder to insert knives and to clean; the wood itself got a little scratched during use.

$67.99*
Recommended with Reservations

Swissmar Bamboo Magnetic Knife Block

This small, scratch-resistant model had a stable, rubber-lined base and could hold all our knives, though the blade of the 12-inch slicing knife stuck out a bit. But inch-long gaps between its small magnets made coverage uneven and forced us to find the magnetic hot spots in order to secure the knives. Its acrylic guard made it safer to use but harder to insert knives and to clean.

$49.93*
Not Recommended

Messermeister Walnut Magnet Block

This handsome block was done in by its shape—a tippy, top-heavy quarter-circle that wasn’t tall or broad enough to keep the blades of three knives from poking out. It lacked a nonslip base, and its extra-strong magnets made it unnerving to attach or remove our heavy cleaver. Finally, it got a bit scratched after extensive use.

$129.95*

Epicurean Standing Knife Rack 12"

This magnetic block sheathed all our knives completely, though with a bit of crowding. But it was hard to insert each knife without hitting the block’s decorative slats on way down, and because the block was light and narrow, it wobbled when bumped. Worse, we couldn’t take it apart, so splatters that hit the interior were there to stay. Additionally, the outside stained easily, and when we wiped it down, the unit smelled like wet dog.

$99.95*

Kapoosh Rondelle Knife Block

This model stabilized knives with a mass of stiff, spaghetti-like bristles that shed and nicked easily after extensive use, covering our knives with plastic debris. While all our knives fit securely, several of the blades stuck out, making this unit feel less safe overall. Finally, though the bristles could be removed and cleaned in the dishwasher, their nooks and crannies made this block hard to wash by hand.

$24.99*

Kuhn Rikon Vision Knife Block, Clear

This plastic block required us to aim each knife into the folds of an accordion-pleated insert that was removable for easy cleaning but got nicked easily with repeated use. Because we could only insert the knives vertically, longer knife blades stuck out; a cleaver was too wide to fit. The lightest model in our lineup, this block was dangerously top-heavy when loaded with knives.

$35.88*